Zorya, the SB-LAB tube microphone created to have its own voice.

In Slavic mythology, Zorya is the goddess of dawn. She is the one who opens the gates to the sun every morning, bringing light after darkness. I chose this name because it perfectly describes what a good microphone should do: not invent anything, not color the sound unnecessarily, but reveal what already exists, bringing it to light.

Every recording is born from an unrepeatable moment. A voice, an instrument, a nuance, an emotion. The role of a microphone is not to transform that moment into something else, but to capture it as completely as possible.

Zorya was born exactly from this philosophy. As many people know, I have never liked copying. In the audio world there are entire markets built around replicas of historic equipment. In the field of valve microphones the situation is even more evident: there are now hundreds of Telefunken U47 clones.

The curious thing is that none of them truly sounds like an original U47. Some modify the circuit, some use valves completely different from the historic ones, some use cheap television pentodes such as the EF80, adapted as best as possible for audio use. And then there are the output transformers, often made according to criteria that have more to do with cost reduction than with sound quality.

The truth is that copying is the easiest road. It is the road of those who need a reference because they are unable to create something of their own. I wanted to build a microphone that was only itself. A microphone that no one could constantly compare with an original from the past. A microphone with its own sonic identity. An SB-LAB microphone.

To start from solid foundations I chose a K47 capsule, one of the most appreciated and musical capsules ever developed, mounted inside a 60 mm style body that offers plenty of space for a mechanical and electronic construction without compromise.

The choice of valve was less obvious. Instead of pentodes such as the EF80 and EF86, used in many commercial projects, I chose the 5670.

The 5670, also known through its equivalents 2C51 and 396A, is an American double triode developed for professional and military applications requiring extremely high reliability. Introduced in 1952, it was used in VHF equipment, avionics systems and devices designed to operate up to 80,000 feet of altitude. It is a valve built to be rugged, quiet, stable and with low microphonics. These characteristics make it ideal for a valve microphone.

In the Hi-Fi world the 5670 has been known for decades as an excellent valve for high-performance preamplifier stages. The better-known 6N1 is a reinterpretation of the 5670, but a far less refined one.

What convinced me was a personal memory. Many years ago Giovanni Mariani, founder of GRAAF and one of the Italian designers I have respected most in my professional life, told me that he had used the 5670 in very high-level microphone preamplifiers. For me, that was an important confirmation. If a valve is able to excel in a professional microphone stage, then it can become the heart of a great microphone. And that is exactly what it became in Zorya.

Once the electronics had been defined, there remained the component that more than any other influences the character of a valve microphone: the output transformer. Here too, I decided to follow a completely personal path. For the core I chose Supermalloy, a material known for its extremely high magnetic permeability and for its performance in very low signal level applications.

The available cores were UI type. The simplest solution would have been to use two separate bobbins, one for the primary and one for the secondary. It is a common choice in many valve transformers, but it is not a choice I share. When two windings communicate mainly through the magnetic core, the higher frequencies and microdetail inevitably suffer. Contrary to many audiophile legends, no ferromagnetic material is truly efficient at directly transferring high frequencies. The finest information passes mainly through the correct coupling between the windings. For this reason I designed and made dedicated single-slot bobbins, printed specifically for this project.

The transformer was developed with a carefully planned winding structure, keeping primary and secondary as close to each other as possible. The result is a completely proprietary transformer, characterized by about 300 Henry of primary inductance and an output impedance of about 200 ohm. This is a sufficiently low value to drive professional inputs of 600 ohm and above without problems, even through very long cables.

During development another aspect emerged that I consider fundamental. Many valve microphones, if not all of them, provide relatively low output levels. This forces the use of high gain in the following preamplifier. At that point the final result depends not only on the microphone, but also heavily on the preamplifier itself. In practice, you spend a lot to obtain a quality microphone and then entrust a large part of the sonic personality to another device.

With Zorya I chose a different approach. The microphone already provides a high output level. This improves the signal-to-noise ratio, makes the use of very long cables less critical and, above all, drastically reduces the need for subsequent preamplification.

In tests carried out with an Avalon valve preamplifier it was necessary to engage the -20dB attenuator, because Zorya’s output level is significantly higher than what is normally expected from a valve microphone. The result is that what you hear is much closer to the native sound of the microphone. To the reality captured by the microphone.

To complete the project I also developed all the support electronics from scratch. Both the internal PCB of the microphone and the dedicated power supply PCB were designed from zero. The filament supply uses an inductor-filtered regulator, while for the anode supply I chose a 6X4 rectifier followed by a classic CLC filter. A traditional, reliable solution, perfectly consistent with the philosophy of the project.

From the power supply panel it is possible to select two polar patterns:

  • Cardioid
  • Omnidirectional

A second adjustment is also available, called:

  • Fat
  • Slim

This function allows the microphone response to be quickly adapted to the sound source and to the type of voice being recorded.

Zorya’s performance did not remain confined to the laboratory. The microphone was used for several months at The Walrus Studio in Spilamberto, Modena, by Roberto Bettini, who was able to work with both the prototype and the final version. His experience was extremely positive.

I used the SB-Lab Zorya valve microphone in the studio in its prototype form for several months, and recently tested the final version.

In my opinion, the Zorya microphone is characterized by high sensitivity. It is able to capture all the nuances of both simple and complex sounds, and has a powerful output that allows excellent signal-to-noise ratios to be achieved, even when recording relatively weak sounds.

When recording, due to its high sensitivity even at very low frequencies, it is advisable to use a high-pass filter in the preamplification stage set around 40 Hz.

Using the filtering options provided, it can adapt to different types of sound sources. Among all possible applications, I recommend it for recording vocals, where it can excel with thin voices such as female voices, giving them good body and presence, and with all acoustic instruments, especially those with high registers.

The post-production treatment of the recorded tracks is straightforward and the expected results are achieved, especially on vocal tracks, without the need to use complex sound processing.

Roberto Bettini

The Walrus Studio
Spilamberto, Modena

Many words can be used to describe the sound of a microphone, but in the end the only truly reliable judge remains listening. For this reason I decided to make available some recordings made with Zorya in real contexts and without artifices intended to mask its character.

  • The first recording is dedicated to an acoustic guitar. In this case the signal coming from the microphone was recorded without any treatment. No equalizer, no compressor, no plugin, no software processing. What you will hear is simply the sound produced by the guitar and captured by Zorya.
  • The second recording is a sung vocal test. Here too, the goal was not to create a finished production, but to allow the microphone’s behavior to be heard on one of the most critical and important sources of all. The voice is often the definitive test bench for any studio microphone.
  • The third example comes from a complete recording performed by a Vasco Rossi cover band. Here Zorya is used within a real musical production, allowing its behavior to be evaluated in the context of a complete mix and not only on an isolated source.

For those who wish to carry out a more accurate listening session using a Hi-Fi system or reference headphones, the original files are also available for download in lossless FLAC format. Inside the ZIP archive you will find the three complete recordings used on this page.

>>> Download Zorya Microphone Demo Files <<<

The invitation is simple: listen, compare and let your ear be the judge. In audio, technical specifications are important, but listening always has the last word. But there is an aspect I consider even more important. Zorya is not just a prototype or an exercise in style.

A complete album has already been recorded with this microphone at The Walrus Studio in Spilamberto, Modena, and was later also released on vinyl. It is therefore not a project that remained on paper or confined to the laboratory, but an instrument that has already faced real professional recording sessions, contributing to the creation of a record intended for the market. For those who wish to hear a real example taken from this work, one of the album tracks is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/dclP4Dq6hoY

Other professional productions and several bands have subsequently used Zorya during their recording sessions, confirming its versatility and its ability to adapt to very different musical contexts.

Zorya under the lens of the instruments

Real recordings remain the best method for evaluating a microphone, but I believe it is also correct to show some instrumental data collected during the development of Zorya. The following graphs are not intended to replace listening, but they allow a better understanding of the design choices that led to the final sonic result.

The first graph shows the bandwidth of the entire audio stage, including valve and output transformer. This test makes it possible to verify the frequency extension and linearity of the circuit, highlighting how the proprietary transformer developed for Zorya is able to correctly transfer both the lowest frequencies and the finest information present in the mid-high range.

The second graph shows the harmonic distortion spectrum. More than the absolute value of distortion, which is particularly low for a valve microphone, it is interesting to observe the distribution of the residual harmonics, present at particularly low levels. The harmonic structure contributes significantly to the perceived timbre of the microphone and represents one of the elements that differentiates a valve design from a completely solid-state implementation.

The third graph shows the acoustic response of the microphone in Flat configuration, without the intervention of the filters and equalizations selectable from the power supply. This measurement makes it possible to observe the natural behavior of the capsule and electronics, providing an objective picture of Zorya’s original voice before any adaptation to different sound sources.

As always, I invite you to interpret these data as a tool for further insight and not as a point of arrival. A microphone is not heard with the eyes, and no graph can ever replace what happens when a voice or an instrument actually starts to sound in front of the capsule.

Zorya represents my idea of a valve microphone. Not a copy of a classic. Not a reinterpretation of someone else’s project. A microphone designed, built and developed entirely in SB-LAB, starting from a blank sheet and arriving at a product capable of finding its own voice. If you would like to listen to it, try it in your studio or receive information about purchasing it, you can contact me directly. I will be happy to tell you about Zorya and, above all, to let you hear it.

Continue reading...

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Why you should not trust “forum” modifications on tube amplifiers

In the internet era it is all too easy to find guides, “improvements”, modifications and technical advice on just about anything, from vacuum cleaners to tube amplifier heads. The problem starts when these modifications are conceived, suggested and replicated by people who do not even have the basic foundations of electronics, and it gets even worse when such interventions involve high voltage, high gain and potentially unstable circuits like tube amplifiers.

The case: a Mesa Boogie DC10 modified at random

A client brought me a Mesa Boogie DC10 amplifier complaining about strange and inexplicable malfunctions. The reason? He had followed a series of modifications found on an American forum where people were discussing the “too closed, dark and boxed-in sound” typical of this machine.

The proposed modifications? Removal of several ceramic capacitors (present on the plates of various stages) and replacement of some resistors, with the intent of “opening up the sound” or “making it more dynamic”. The apparent result, according to the owner, initially seemed positive. But shortly after, absurd behaviors appeared: pedals no longer working properly, amplifier controls behaving unpredictably, and even a DVD drive connected to the PC that, as soon as the amp was powered on, went crazy opening and closing the tray repeatedly…

The diagnosis: instability and EMI interference

Once on my bench, the amplifier turned out to be highly unstable. It was self-oscillating at radio frequency (RF), generating all kinds of electromagnetic interference (EMI). RF oscillations in an audio circuit are not heard as “hiss” or “hum”, but they can interfere with other electronic devices, generate anomalous behavior in internal circuits, and in extreme cases even damage components or emit disturbing signals that propagate into the environment. In short, an amplifier that no longer amplifies, but transmits.

Why did Mesa add those capacitors?

Mesa Boogie amplifiers, by their nature or by design choice, have a rather dark and compressed sound, with a soft attack. Many people like it (Santana included), others do not. But what is often not understood is that this sound is not only the result of tube choice or equalization, it is also a consequence of the need to keep a circuit stable that is not exactly “well-behaved”.

Mesa designers, over time, added numerous RF suppression networks (snubbers, ceramic capacitors to ground in strategic points) precisely to tame these instabilities. What to the inexperienced user look like “useless capacitors that eat the sound” are in reality necessary to prevent the amplifier from becoming a generator of radio interference or behaving unpredictably.

Removing a few capacitors here and there is not enough

Removing disliked components “because someone said so” is like randomly loosening bolts under a car thinking it will improve aerodynamics. If you really want to change the sonic character of an amplifier, you cannot avoid a complete review of the design: stage gains, feedback, impedances, wiring layout (or PCB layout, if it cannot realistically be modified), tube operating points, RC couplings. Everything is interconnected, and every modification can have potentially devastating effects on overall stability.

This applies to guitar amps as well as HiFi

This kind of superficiality is not limited to instrument amplifiers. Even in the HiFi world you can find “experts” who suggest removing ceramic capacitors “because they sound bad”, ignoring that their primary function is to block or suppress high frequency oscillations that have nothing to do with the audio signal. Yes, sometimes these components can “color” the sound. But removing them without a serious analysis of the consequences is equivalent to playing Russian roulette with the integrity of the amplifier.

Conclusion: if you do not like the Mesa sound, do not buy a Mesa

The client in question paid three times: once to buy the amplifier, once to have it “improved”, and a third time to have me fix it and restore it to the original design. The only correct way to modify an amplifier is: knowing exactly what you are doing. And if you are not capable, it is better to leave it as it is or turn to someone with real expertise.

My advice is simple: if you do not like the sound of a Mesa Boogie, do not buy one. But please, do not turn it into a random frequency jammer based on opinions read in a 2009 thread written by a nickname with a cat avatar.

Final test video

In the video below you can see the Mesa Boogie DC10 after my complete restoration to the original schematic. The client is testing it in the workshop: no oscillations, no strange interference, responsive controls and above all a stable and coherent sound. This is concrete proof that circuit stability and reliability come before any “forum tweak”.

Continue reading...

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Repairing the Mesa Boogie DC-5: common issues and how to bring a ruined amplifier back to life

The Mesa Boogie Dual Caliber DC-5 is one of the most representative amplifiers of Mesa’s 1990s production, a powerful and versatile combo with truly independent channels and a punchy dynamic response that made it a reference point for rock and metal guitarists. Like many Mesa products of that era, the DC-5 is built robustly, with a complex circuit that integrates logic switching, relays, JFETs and optoisolators to manage muting, channel switching and various auxiliary functions. This very complexity, however, makes it an amplifier that, when it fails, can turn into a minefield for anyone attempting to repair it.

The story of the repair of this unit proves it perfectly.

A completely silent amplifier. The unit arrived absolutely mute. The owner suspected a faulty tube, but on the uTracer all tubes tested perfectly fine. The problem was somewhere else.

Opening the DC-5 revealed the first surprise: the power transformer had been replaced with a clone, and whoever did the job did not think, or did not know how, to recover the original connector. The wires of the new transformer had been soldered directly onto the PCB pins, a questionable choice that made any future work far more laborious. Now, to remove the board, everything must be desoldered each time, with wires inevitably getting damaged. A brilliant idea indeed.

Burnt capacitors and the first clear faults. The first “real” repair involved three completely cooked 1000uF electrolytic capacitors, which I replaced. Nothing surprising so far. The true nightmare began afterwards.

The channel-switching and function-switching circuit completely dead. During the first tests it became clear that the entire part of the circuit controlling the various relays, mute, Lead/Rhythm channel switching and other functions, was out of order. As the diagnosis continued, I found:

  • A series of completely dead transistors
  • Several JFET J175 no longer functional
  • All 4N33 optoisolators burnt
  • Only two transistors still working among the devastation

I have no idea what might have happened to this amplifier, but high voltage must have reached a part of the circuit where it absolutely should never be, because the level of destruction was far beyond a normal failure. Unobtainable components, misleading tests and repeated disassembly.

To proceed I had to specifically purchase the 4N33 and the J175, while two other transistors could be replaced with common BC547.

The biggest difficulty was that many components appeared healthy with an in-circuit test but revealed their faults only once desoldered. For example, the J175, tested on-board, seemed regular (the two diodes with a common anode appeared correctly). Only once removed and placed on a proper semiconductor tester did they show that they were actually dead.

This meant removing, desoldering, testing, reinstalling… and repeating the entire process multiple times. A real ordeal. To make matters worse, finding the correct schematic for this precise PCB revision was another significant waste of time.

The happy ending, after many hours of work, headaches and repeated diagnosis, finally arrived: the new components brought the DC-5 back to life, and the amplifier now performs exactly as it should. A truly demanding job, but one that once again proves how important it is to entrust these amplifiers to someone who knows them well and has the tools to face complex failures.

Do you own a Mesa Boogie DC-5 that needs service? If your DC-5 suffers from mute issues, channel switching faults, noises, logic circuit failures or power supply problems – or if you simply want to have it checked – you can contact me through the SB-LAB website. I can handle diagnosis, repair and full restoration of this model.

Continue reading...

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.